Palabras clave: Evaluación de credibilidad; discapacidad intelectual; criterios de .. La prueba pericial psicológica sobre la credibilidad del testimonio. la pericial psicológica de la credibilidad del testimonio. En un estudio de archivo, . las técnicas tradicionales de evaluación psicológica que son totalmente. A.L. ManzaneroProcedimientos de evaluación de la credibilidad de las MuñozLa prueba pericial psicológica sobre la credibilidad del testimonio: Reflexiones.

Author: Moogubei Natilar
Country: Saint Lucia
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Spiritual
Published (Last): 23 October 2004
Pages: 276
PDF File Size: 2.28 Mb
ePub File Size: 3.32 Mb
ISBN: 993-1-99950-554-8
Downloads: 39697
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Faegami

Witness competency in people with mental retardation: In Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. On the other hand, the wide variability in memory origin means that the characteristics differentiating fantasies, lies, dreams, and post-event information are not the same. The benefit of asking unanticipated questions. The same instructions were given for all interviews conducted: Improving the understanding of why the cognitive interview works.

Credibulidad example, changing a small detail of an actual event-even a very important detail, such as whether the role played in the event was witness or protagonistis not the same thing as fabricating the entire event Manzanero, Phenomenal characteristics of autobiographical memories for emotional and neutral events in older and younger adults.

Expert Evidence, 7, All measurements, with the exception of lengthwere measured by counting the number of times each one occurred in the statements.

Two evaluators trained in credibility analysis procedures using content criteria evaluated 13 true statements and 16 false statements. The eyewitness suggestibility effect and memory for source.

Recensión. Evaluación Pericial Psicológica de Credibilidad de Testimonio

Likewise, from the results obtained in this study, we can conclude that the above-mentioned technique is also not valid for distinguishing between statements given by actual and tewtimonio victims with ID. The detection of deception with the reality monitoring approach: When cluster A is considered equal to simulation and B equal to actual, the false statements were correctly classified in 16 cases If we tried to classify the two types of statements based on all the phenomenological characteristics considered in the RM technique, K-Means Cluster Analysis grouped 25 cases as false and 7 as true.


The child sexual abuse accomodation syndrome. The truth about lies: Applied Cognitive Psychology,18, Toward a Cognitive Lie Detection Approach. Recent developments in statement analysis.

Discerning truth from deception: Cluster analysis can group cases with a Twenty-nine persons with intellectual disability participated in the study. Perceived credibility and eyewitness testimony of children with intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, A researcher selected the participants, all of comparable IQ, on the basis of criteria for the “true” group-did go on the day trip-and the “false” group-did not go on the day trip but knew about the event from references made to it.

Further research with these criteria, along with a system of analysis that would enable all indicators to be taken into account in making a decision, might shed more light on content-based lie detection procedures. General, 4 As may be appreciated evaulacion the graph in Figure 2one possible explanation for the scant difference between the two types of statements stems from intersubject variability, which would indicate that this technique has low diagnostic capability.


Table 2 shows the mean scores and standard deviations for testmonio statements and true statements and the totals for each criterion.

International developments in research and practice pp. Forensic psychology has proposed various procedures for evaluating credibility through analysis of statement content Manzanero, An experimental phenomenological approach.

Evaluacion Pericial by Pamela Alvarez on Prezi

Verschuere Ed Detecting Deception: If the criteria that enable us to distinguish between true and false statements are the amount of detail and the length of the statement-the first percial being especially important in evaluating a testimony as “true”-what happens with all those individuals who have limited vocabulary, semantic and autobiographical memory deficits without which they cannot satisfactorily reproduce conversationsor difficulty situating events in a given context?

Credibilidav representation using high-dimensional visualization HDV with all criteria taken into consideration shows that the two types of statements are quite heterogeneous.

Functional Analysis in behavior therapy. Qualitative effects of rehearsal on memories for perceived and imagined complex events.

Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, In future research studies, testimonies given by persons with more severe ID should be analyzed on the basis of these criteria because we understand that, the more severe the disability, the more difficult it is for the individual to narrate with sufficient detail, to situate an event in a context, and to reproduce conversations.